President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo and the Electoral Commission (EC) have given their responses to an election petition filed the Presidential Candidate of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), former President John Dramani Mahama, challenging the declaration of President Akufo-Addo as the winner of the 2020 presidential election.
For President Akufo-Addo, the petition lacks substance, and rather a “face-saving” attempt Former President Mahama.
“The instant action is a ruse and face-saving gimmick the petitioner after the petitioner and many senior members of the NDC party had prematurely claimed outright victory in the election, only to be badly exposed results of the 1st respondent (EC), corroborated all media houses of note in the country as well as many independent local and international observers,” President Akufo-Addo argued.
In separate answers to the petition filed at the Supreme Court Registry Saturday, Jan 9, 2021, the two respondents described the petition as one that lacks merit, incompetent, and does not raise any reasonable cause of action.
The two, apart from attacking the substance of the petition, have also raised a preliminary legal objection, arguing that the petition does not even meet the requirement of Article 64(1) of the 1992 Constitution.
It is the case of the two that the petition does not allege infraction in any of the elections conducted at the 38,622 polling stations and 311 special voting centers.
Based on preliminary legal objections, President Akufo-Addo and the EC are asking the Supreme Court to throw out the petition without even going into its merit.
It is the case of President Akufo-Addo that the petition former President Mahama seeks to challenge the declaration of the results the EC, and not the election itself.
He argues that that makes the petition incompetent, arguing that alleged inaccuracies in the declaration of the results do not mean the election of “2nd respondent (Akufo-Addo) is invalid”
For the EC, it was “misconceived and untenable” for Former President Mahama in the petition, to rely on the error made the Chairperson of the EC on December 9, 2020, when she inadvertently mentioned the total number of votes cast as the total valid votes.
“The full results of the December 7 presidential election were known to the petitioner and that the claims in the petition are contrived, have no legal basis and ought to be dismissed,” the EC argued.
more to follow…
By preventing me from completing my legislative obligations, you have broken the law – Assin North MP tells Supreme Court
Listen to this article James Gyakye Quayson, the restrained Assin North MP, has asked the …